The Infinite Monkey Rule

I always learn things from listening to the radio. On 'The Infinite Monkey Cage', I heard Brian Cox rattle off a 'rule of thumb', which goes something like:

A number plus or minus the square root of the sample size is consistent with random sampling error.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04yfsst (listen from 20 minutes in)

I hadn't heard that one, but deploying those key research tools, the back of an envelope and a pencil, I could see where it comes from.

I hope I am allowed to paraphrase Brian's rule:

If the excess (or deficit) number of cases meeting a criterion is larger than the square root of the sample size, it's statistically significant.

The way I'd normally look for a statistically significant difference in a proportion is calculating the standard error of proportion (SEP), and using twice that (actually 1.96) to find the 95% confidence interval (CI).  For a percentage of 50% (proportion = 0.5) in a sample of 100, it works out as exactly 10%. Suppose we toss a coin a hundred times: we'd expect 50 heads and 50 tails, but we would accept 10% either way, 40%-60%. Anything outside that range suggests something unusual has happened -- a biased coin, a biased recording method -- but maybe just an unusual run of results.

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
            p=50%     n= 100
                     
            5%   SEP      
                     
            10% 2xSEP    
                     
          -10% +10% ±2xSEP    
        40% <--- ---> 60%      
          95% CI        

Anyhow, to get to the 'square root of the sample size', we can derive it from the formula:

  • For a proportion p seen in a sample n, SEP=root((p(1-p)/n)
  • The SEP will be highest for p=0.5 (p(1-p)=0.25) and lowest for something near 0.1 (p(1-p)=0.09).
  • For a sample n, the biggest 95% CI = 2*root(0.25/n) = 2*0.5/root(n) = 1/root(n).
  • So, if the excess proportion p is expressed as a fraction m/n, this needs to be at least 1/root(n).  
  • We can cross-multiply by n to get m >= n/root(n) >= root(n), which is the size of Brian Cox's thumb.

So, for a sample size of 100, we're looking for a difference larger than 10, the square root of 100; for a sample of 50, a difference greater than 7.

This rule uses the 'worst case' of a proportion at or near 50%, when the 95% CI is at its widest, so sometimes a smaller difference will be statistically significant.

Topics: 

Author: 

DrDave